Comments on: Matrix transforms based on an arbitrary registration point http://keith-hair.net/blog/2009/01/24/matrix-transforms-based-on-an-arbitrary-registration-point/ Scripting is fun like any other hobby Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:17:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Matthew Clifford http://keith-hair.net/blog/2009/01/24/matrix-transforms-based-on-an-arbitrary-registration-point/comment-page-1/#comment-601 Matthew Clifford Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:35:24 +0000 http://keith-hair.net/blog/?p=28#comment-601 Hello Keith, This is an astonishingly good post and fantastic working example... Would you be willing to post a link to the source code for this, as it would be most appreciated? Kind regards, Matthew Hello Keith,

This is an astonishingly good post and fantastic working example…

Would you be willing to post a link to the source code for this, as it would be most appreciated?

Kind regards,

Matthew

]]> By: Keith H http://keith-hair.net/blog/2009/01/24/matrix-transforms-based-on-an-arbitrary-registration-point/comment-page-1/#comment-164 Keith H Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:08:13 +0000 http://keith-hair.net/blog/?p=28#comment-164 Thanks Flanture, but I may be describing the kind of skew I want to do incorrectly. I would like to skew a separate value along the horizontal edge of the shape, and also skew a separate value along the vertical edge of the shape. I’ve updated this post with a diagram showing the kind of skew I’d like to do. To make the skewing run along the edges is what I wish to do. After skewing along the horizontal axis first, the vertical axis is different. Visa versa if I skewed along the vertical axis first. Thanks Flanture, but I may be describing the kind of skew I want to do incorrectly. I would like to skew a separate value along the horizontal edge of the shape, and also skew a separate value along the vertical edge of the shape. I’ve updated this post with a diagram showing the kind of skew I’d like to do.

To make the skewing run along the edges is what I wish to do. After skewing along the horizontal axis first, the vertical axis is different. Visa versa if I skewed along the vertical axis first.

]]> By: J. http://keith-hair.net/blog/2009/01/24/matrix-transforms-based-on-an-arbitrary-registration-point/comment-page-1/#comment-162 J. Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:15:24 +0000 http://keith-hair.net/blog/?p=28#comment-162 simple, direct and clean. Thanks! simple, direct and clean. Thanks!

]]> By: Flanture http://keith-hair.net/blog/2009/01/24/matrix-transforms-based-on-an-arbitrary-registration-point/comment-page-1/#comment-161 Flanture Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:25:36 +0000 http://keith-hair.net/blog/?p=28#comment-161 not sure if this is what you need, but try: ... skewAmount:Number=0; ... skewM.c=skewM.b=Math.tan(skewAmount); ... It performs skew on both axis in the same time not sure if this is what you need, but try:
…
skewAmount:Number=0;
…
skewM.c=skewM.b=Math.tan(skewAmount);
…
It performs skew on both axis in the same time

]]>